Using language with a amount that is suitable of can protect your claims from being easily dismissed. It also helps to point the level of certainty we now have in relation to the evidence or support.
Compare the next two texts that are short (A) and (B). You will see that although the two texts are, in essence, saying the thing that is same (B) has an important amount of extra language across the claim. A amount that is large of language is performing the purpose of ‘hedging’.
Compare the next two short texts, (A) and (B). How many differences can you see into the text that is second? What is the function/effect/purpose of each and every difference?
You shall probably notice that (B) is much more ‘academic’, however it is important to comprehend why.
(A) Extensive reading helps students to enhance their vocabulary.
(B) Research conducted by Yen (2005) appears to indicate that, for an important proportion of students, extensive reading may subscribe to an improvement inside their active vocabulary. Yen’s (2005) study involved learners aged 15-16 into the UK, even though it might be applicable with other groups. However, the study involved an sample that is opt-in which means that the sample students may have been more ‘keen’, or more involved in reading already. It could be useful to see if the findings differ in a wider sample.
(take note that Yen (2005) is a reference that is fictional only for instance).
The table below provides some examples of language to make use of when knowledge that is making.
Look for examples of hedging language in your own reading, to add to the table.
Phrases for Hedging
Language Function with Example Phrases
a minority/majority of
a proportion of
to a point
has the appearance of
is similar to
shares characteristics with
appears to stay line with